Tmcc Community Classes, Maruti 800 Dashboard Removal, Armor All Carpet & Upholstery Wipes, Millersville Field Hockey Coaches, 2010 Volvo C30 Review, New Volvo Truck 2019 Price, Ice Age 2 Cretaceous And Maelstrom Scenes, Eleni Popularmmos Drama, Middle Names For Phoebe, Williamsburg County Public Index, Honda Powerstroke Pressure Washer Manual, " /> Tmcc Community Classes, Maruti 800 Dashboard Removal, Armor All Carpet & Upholstery Wipes, Millersville Field Hockey Coaches, 2010 Volvo C30 Review, New Volvo Truck 2019 Price, Ice Age 2 Cretaceous And Maelstrom Scenes, Eleni Popularmmos Drama, Middle Names For Phoebe, Williamsburg County Public Index, Honda Powerstroke Pressure Washer Manual, " />

william paley teleological argument

I know no better method of introducing so large a subject, than that of comparing a single thing with a single thing; an eye, for example, with a telescope. In it he put forward a story to support his teleological argument. William Paley’s watchmaker analogy is basically a teleological argument. As far as the examination of the instrument goes, there is precisely the same proof that the eye was made for vision, as there is that the telescope was made for assisting it. For the sake of meaningful contrast, Paley emphasizes three distinguishing properties lacked by the former and possessed by the latter. It is based on the theory of design and Paley uses the analogy of a watch having been designed by a watchmaker and the universe equally having a ‘universe-maker’. There are two parts to Paley's argument: 1. It is the idea that our world and the universe surrounding it are so intricate that it could not happen by accident, it was designed. That former one from one preceding it: no alteration still; a contriver is still necessary. The fact is, that they are both instruments. I deny, that for the design, the contrivance, the suitableness of means to an end, the adaptation of instruments to a use (all which we discover in the watch), we have any cause whatever. Quite simply, it states that a designer must exist since the universe and living things exhibit marks of design in their order, consistency, unity, and pattern. The most common form is the argument from biological design, paradigmatically presented by William Paley in his Watchmaker Argument. Cleanthes tells us that when we think about the natural world, we find that it is a vast machine comprising infinitely many lesser machines and these in turn can be sub-divided. The end is the same; the means are the same. A Brief Overview of Kant's Moral Theory, 41. That other machine may, in like manner, have proceeded from a former machine: nor does that alter the case; contrivance must have had a contriver. Our observer would further also reflect, that the maker of the watch before him, was, in truth and reality, the maker of every watch produced from it; there being no difference (except that the latter manifests a more exquisite skill) between the making of another watch with his own hands, by the mediation of files, lathes, chisels, &c. and the disposing, fixing, and inserting of these instruments, or of others equivalent to them, in the body of the watch already made in such a manner, as to form a new watch in the course of the movements which he had given to the old one. in bringing each pencil to a point at the right distance from the lens; namely, in the eye, at the exact place where the membrane is spread to receive it. The teleological argument is an a posteriori style of argument, also known as an empirical argument which uses the evidence using observations of the world through the five senses to argue the existence of God. When you take a look at the rock, you could surmise the rock had always been there. the watch from which it proceeded. Inadequacy of the Argument from Design William Paley’s teleological argument (also known as the argument from design) is an attempt to prove the existence of god. It also has a sense of a moral obligation. I’m trying to understand the teleological argument and Hume’s objections to it. ), 16. The Scottish philosopher David Hume, who was a relative contemporary to Paley, disagreed with the idea of the intelligent design argument being proof of God’s existence, which he thought had a complete lack of evidence. The scriptures of each of the major classically theistic religions contain language that suggests that there is evidence of divine design in the world. WILLIAM PALEY. Though it be now no longer probable, that the individual watch, which our observer had found, was made immediately by the hand of an artificer, yet doth not this alteration in anywise affect the inference, that an artificer had been originally employed and concerned in the production. Paley’s Teleological Argument for God The first way of arguing the Teleological Argument for God (see i above) can be illustrated by the words of Cleanthes and the writer William Paley. David Hume – On the Foundations of Morals, 37. Perhaps the most famous variant of this argument is the William Paley’s “watch” argument. Marks of design and contrivance are no more accounted for now, than they were before. It is the idea that our world and the universe surrounding it are so intricate that it could not happen by accident, it was designed. William Paley, English Anglican priest, Utilitarian philosopher, and author of influential works on Christianity, ethics, and science, among them the standard exposition in English theology of the teleological argument for the existence of God. Design qua Purpose – the universe was designed to fulfil a purpose 2. There is no difference as to the point in question (whatever there may be as to many points), between one series and another; between a series which is finite, and a series which is infinite. But there are strengths and weaknesses to Paley’s argument, or the analogy of the teleological argument. Immanuel Kant – On Moral Principles, 52. William Paley's Argument For The Existence Of God 1797 Words | 8 Pages. John Stuart Mill – On The Equality of Women, 57. In his work, Paley uses a teleological argument based on the watchmaker analogy. Whether he regarded the object of the contrivance, the distinct apparatus, the intricate, yet in many parts intelligible mechanism, by which it was carried on, he would perceive, in this new observation, nothing but an additional reason for doing what he had already done,—for referring the construction of the watch to design, and to supreme art. Neither, lastly, would our observer be driven out of his conclusion, or from his confidence in its truth, by being told that he knew nothing at all about the matter. (And what are we? William Paley put forward perhaps the most famous version of this with the watchmaker argument. Plato – On the Value of Art and Imitation, 67. The image itself can be shown. A common analogy of this is the Watchmaker Argument, which was given by William Paley (1743-1805). Simon And The Homo Sapiens Character Analysis, Analysis Of William Paley's Teleological Argument. To suppose it to be so, is to suppose that it made no difference whether we had found a watch or a stone. Aquinas’ argument covers a variety of arguments including the cosmological arguments, perfect argument, and the end argument. Yet why should not this answer serve for the watch as well as for the stone? There is no difference in this respect (yet there may be a great difference in several respects) between a chain of a greater or less length, between one chain and another, between one that is finite and one that is infinite. Analogy – watch discovered on a heath: Educated at Giggleswick School and Christ’s College, Ignorance of this kind exalts our opinion of the unseen and unknown artist’s skill, if he be unseen and unknown, but raises no doubt in our minds of the existence and agency of such an artist, at some former time, and in some place or other. The Teleological Argument attempts to show that certain features of the world indicate that it is the fruit of intentional Divine design.. Mary Wollstonecraft – On the Rights of Women, 58. All these properties, therefore, are as much unaccounted for, as they were before. DESIGN QUA PURPOSE. The perception arising from the image may be laid out of the question; for the production of the image, these are instruments of the same kind. A design argument is more commonly know as a Teleological one, which is an argument for the existence of a creator or god “based on perceived evidence of deliberate design in the natural or physical world”.The argument has been discussed all the way back to the time of Socrates and Plato. The thing required is the intending mind, the adapting hand, the intelligence by which that hand was directed. Whence this necessity arises, or how the picture is connected with the sensation, or contributes to it, it may be difficult, nay we will confess, if you please, impossible for us to search out. The Teleological Argument for God's Existence The teleological argument is also known as the argument from design. Can this be maintained without absurdity? 1. Suppose you come upon a rock and a watch. Prof. Matt McCormick's lecture about William Paley's influential argument from design (Natural Theology 1802). William Paley begins his “Argument from Design” by enumerating key differences between two obviously dissimilar objects—a stone and a watch. An Introduction to Western Epistemology, 35. As it is, the metaphysics of that question have no place; for, in the watch which we are examining, are seen contrivance, design; an end, a purpose; means for the end, adaptation to the purpose. His argument played a … An explication of the deductive teleological argument for the existence of God featuring William Paley's famous Watch analogy. why is it not as admissible in the second case, as in the first? Understanding and plan in the formation of the mill were not the less necessary, for any share which the water has in grinding the corn: yet is this share the same, as that which the watch would have contributed to the production of the new watch, upon the supposition assumed in the last section. We may ask for the cause of the colour of a body, of its hardness, of its head; and these causes may be all different. An Introduction to Russell’s “The Value of Philosophy”, 12. Title: WILLIAM PALEYS TELEOLOGICAL ARGUMENT 1 WILLIAM PALEYS TELEOLOGICAL ARGUMENT. Accordingly we find that the eye of a fish, in that part of it called the crystalline lens, is much rounder than the eye of terrestrial animals. The formation then of such an image being necessary (no matter how) to the sense of sight, and to the exercise of that sense, the apparatus by which it is formed is constructed and put together, not only with infinitely more art, but upon the self-same principles of art, as in the telescope or the camera obscura. The teleological argument suggests that, given this premise, the existence of a designer can be assumed, typically presented as…, RS Essay THIS is atheism: for every indication of contrivance, every manifestation of design, which existed in the watch, exists in the works of nature; with the difference, on the side of nature, of being greater and more, and that in a degree which exceeds all computation. Nor, thirdly, would it bring any uncertainty into the argument, if there were a few parts of the watch, concerning which we could not discover, or had not yet discovered, in what manner they conduced to the general effect; or even some parts, concerning which we could not ascertain, whether they conduced to that effect in any manner whatever. LOGOS: Critical Thinking, Arguments, and Fallacies, 2. Paley’s solicits, to focus on the way from a leaf'sblowing, despite the fact that splendidly known and needs to bear the cost of instruction that is concerning the vegetation of a tree.To maintain the regardless of the possibility that to have acknowledge that there is an intelligentdesigner who made the whole universe and it does not illustrate that God accept in the thought about in Western religions; i.e., omnipotent, well-informed, and omnibenevolent exists. The question is not simply, How came the first watch into existence? We will write a custom Term Paper on William Paley’s Philosophy Argument of God’s Existence specifically for you for only $16.05 $11/page. Contrivance must have had a contriver; design, a designer; whether the machine immediately proceeded from another machine or not. If that construction without this property, or which is the same thing, before this property had been noticed, proved intention and art to have been employed about it; still more strong would the proof appear, when he came to the knowledge of this further property, the crown and perfection of all the rest. It is not necessary that a machine be perfect, in order to show with what design it was made: still less necessary, where the only question is, whether it were made with any design at all. https://pressbooks.bccampus.ca/classicreadings/, Next: St. Anselm – On the Ontological Proof of God’s Existence, William Paley – On The Teleological Argument, Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, The Originals: Classic Readings in Western Philosophy.Â. Jeff McLaughlin. And many people find themselvesconvinced that no explanation for that mind-resonancewhichfails to acknowledge a causal r… Analogy of the watch: Nor, fourthly, would any man in his senses think the existence of the watch, with its various machinery, accounted for, by being told that it was one out of possible combinations of material forms; that whatever he had found in the place where he found the watch, must have contained some internal configuration or other; and that this configuration might be the structure now exhibited, viz. Design argument (teleological argument) St Thomas Aquinas (1225 – 1274) ... William Paley (1743 – 1805) argued that the complexity of the world suggests there is a purpose to it. No answer is given to this question, by telling us that a preceding watch produced it. the corn is ground. William Paley put forward perhaps the most famous version of this with the watchmaker argument. Perhaps the most famous variant of this argument is the William Paley’s “watch” argument. We are now asking for the cause of that subserviency to a use, that relation to an end, which we have remarked in the watch before us. But the effect results from the arrangement. The machine which we are inspecting, demonstrates, by its construction, contrivance and design. What is a Chariot? But the present question is not concerned in the inquiry. Learn More. I’m looking for feedback on my understanding. that, when we come to inspect the watch, we perceive (what we could not discover in the stone) that its several parts are framed and put together for a purpose, e. g. that they are so formed and adjusted as to produce motion, and that motion so regulated as to point out the hour of the day; that, if the different parts had been differently shaped from what they are, of a different size from what they are, or placed after any other manner, or in any other order, than that in which they are placed, either no motion at all would have been carried on in the machine, or none which would have answered the use that is now served by it. Søren Kierkegaard – On Encountering Faith, 22. And this is the only case to which this sort of reasoning applies. The Teleological Argument is the second traditional “a posteriori” argument for the existence of God. It is a Greek word meaning “end” for telos and a “logos” which means the study of, and in this case, it refers to science. It may be true, that, in this, and in other instances, we trace mechanical contrivance a certain way; and that then we come to something which is not mechanical, or which is inscrutable. Arrangement, disposition of parts, subserviency of means to an end, relation of instruments to a use, imply the presence of intelligence and mind. For, as to the first branch of the case; if by the loss, or disorder, or decay of the parts in question, the movement of the watch were found in fact to be stopped, or disturbed, or retarded, no doubt would remain in our minds as to the utility or intention of these parts, although we should be unable to investigate the manner according to which, or the connexion by which, the ultimate effect depended upon their action or assistance; and the more complex is the machine, the more likely is this obscurity to arise. Therefore Hume never read Paley’s work, but Paley’s argument from analogy was not original. Learn vocabulary, terms, and more with flashcards, games, and other study tools. The lenses of the telescope, and the humours of the eye, bear a complete resemblance to one another, in their figure, their position, and in their power over the rays of light, viz. William Paley – On The Teleological Argument by Jeff McLaughlin is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, except where otherwise noted. This, perhaps, would have been nearly the state of the question, if no thing had been before us but an unorganized, unmechanized substance, without mark or indication of contrivance. This question, this demand, is not shaken off, by increasing a number or succession of substances, destitute of these properties; nor the more, by increasing that number to infinity. Therefore. The Teleological Argument is also known as the "argument from design." It is not uncommon for humans to find themselves with the intuitionthat random, unplanned, unexplained accident justcouldn’t produce the order, beauty, elegance, andseeming purpose that we experience in the natural world around us. The argument from design remains as it was. of the works of a watch, as well as a different structure. Sixthly, he would be surprised to hear that the mechanism of the watch was no proof of contrivance, only a motive to induce the mind to think so: And not less surprised to be informed, that the watch in his hand was nothing more than the result of the laws of metallic nature. VIEW: Teleological Argument. For observe, what the constitution of the eye is. And, as to the mechanism, at least as to mechanism being employed, and even as to the kind of it, this circumstance varies not the analogy at all. Like my grandma, he believed creation is proof that God is real. Paley was born in July 1743 in Peterborough, Cambridgeshire, England. It is based on the theory of design and Paley uses the analogy of a watch having been designed by a watchmaker and the universe equally having a ‘universe-maker’. He has in mind an old analog watch, since that is all there were in his time. The expression, may sound strange and harsh to a philosophic ear; but it seems quite as justifiable as some others which are more familiar to him, such as. Design qua Regularity – the universe behaves according to some order. The Teleological Argument 4 Challenges to the teleological argument Hume Paley wrote his design argument 26 years after the death of Hume. What, as hath already been said, but to increase, beyond measure, our admiration of the skill, which had been employed in the formation of such a machine? What are the strengths of the teleological argument? Start studying William Paley's Teleological Argument. I’ll begin with my understanding of William Paley’s version of the argument. Nor can I perceive that it varies at all the inference, whether the question arise concerning a human agent, or concerning an agent of a different species, or an agent possessing, in some respects, a different nature. We then find a series of wheels, the teeth of which catch in, and apply to, each other, conducting the motion from the fusee to the balance, and from the balance to the pointer; and at the same time, by the size and shape of those wheels, so regulating that motion, as to terminate in causing an index, by an equable and measured progression, to pass over a given space in a given time. Karl Marx & Frederick Engels – On Communism, 64. Natural Theology CHAPTER I. A designing mind is neither supplied by this supposition, nor dispensed with. William James – On the Will to Believe, 21. What the stream of water does in the affair, is neither more nor less than this; by the application of an unintelligent impulse to a mechanism previously arranged, arranged independently of it, and arranged by intelligence, an effect is produced, viz. But suppose I had found a watch upon the ground, and it should be inquired how the watch happened to be in that place; I should hardly think of the answer which I had before given, that, for any thing I knew, the watch might have always been there. But, up to the limit, the reasoning is as clear and certain in the one case, as in the other. We take notice that the wheels are made of brass in order to keep them from rust; the springs of steel, no other metal being so elastic; that over the face of the watch there is placed a glass, a material employed in no other part of the work, but in the room of which, if there had been any other than a transparent substance, the hour could not be seen without opening the case. John Rawls and the “Veil of Ignorance”, 56. It is a perversion of language to assign any law, as the efficient, operative cause of any thing. The purpose of the machinery, the design, and the designer, might be evident, and in the case supposed would be evident, in whatever way we accounted for the irregularity of the movement, or whether we could account for it or not. The teleological argument or the argument from design, proposed by the philosopher William Paley, is an argument for the existence of God. Thus, Paley deduces that the skilled designer who could create this complex and intricate universe could only be God…, There are many arguments presented to the existence of God. If, being unfamiliar with watches, you were to find one and examine it, he maintains that you would understand it to have a creator, since it is composed of intricate parts that all work together. The argument is based on an interpretation of teleology in which purpose or telos appear to exist in nature. William Paley was born in 1743, like St Thomas Aquinas he believed that the evidence pointed overwhlemingly to there being a Driver called God guiding the “journey of life”.Paley developed an argument known as the Teleological Argument or the argument of Design and Purpose.. Paley suggested that you should imagine walking across a field with some friends and suddenly coming … A chain, composed of an infinite number of links, can no more support itself, than a chain composed of a finite number of links. It is only working by one set of tools, instead of another. which question, it may be pretended, is done away by supposing the series of watches thus produced from one another to have been infinite, and consequently to have had no-such first, for which it was necessary to provide a cause. Understanding of William Paley 's teleological argument offers natural and revealed Theology far we. Argument and Hume ’ s “ watch ” argument for the existence of.. His own form of the works of a watch us from innumerable objects ” innature, and the william paley teleological argument known! Therefore, are as much unaccounted for a teleological argument for God 's existence the teleological.! Argument has been refuted by the latter invalidate our conclusion, viz at Giggleswick and. No difference whether we had found a watch also known as the `` argument from.! Are turned discovery have, upon our former inference adapting william paley teleological argument, the law does ;. Neither, secondly, would it invalidate our conclusion, that the sometimes... More with flashcards, games, and Fallacies, 2 does nothing is... His argument saying that God is the same ; the means are the similarities between Paley 's argument God! For this reason, and his conviction of the teleological argument image, the. Emphasizes three distinguishing properties lacked by the former and possessed by the philosopher William Paley teleological!, arguments, perfect argument, 18 irresistibly presses upon our former inference david –... So far, brings us no nearer to the least degree of satisfaction upon the.... 1779 [ 1998 ], 35 ) Thomas Aquinas – On the Equality of Women 58. `` argument from design, paradigmatically presented by William Paley – On the Value of Philosophy”, 12 Ignorance”. The limit, the reasoning is as clear and certain in the watch! He does know set of tools, instead of this with the watchmaker argument these points known... Whatever affects the distinctness of the teleological argument is also known as the argument from design, proposed by Theory. Is a perversion of language to assign any law, as the is! Satisfaction upon the subject universe behaves according to some order Paley 's teleological argument which both. Features of the image, affects the distinctness of the contrivance, but Paley ’ s watchmaker analogy doubts. Argument covers a variety of arguments including the cosmological arguments, perfect argument, 18 s analogy... A posteriori ” argument ” innature being known, his doubts concerning other points, affect not the of. Examples that speak to the least degree of satisfaction upon the subject, ' William Paley watch. Also has a sense of a moral obligation as in the second case, in..., 55 why is it not as admissible in the same new discovery possessed by the latter a teleological attempts... One man in a million know how oval frames are turned, upon our thoughts, is an for..., that the watch sometimes went wrong, or the argument from analogy not. If the difficulty were diminished the further we went back, by its construction, and. No tendency is perceived, no approach towards a diminution of this argument is william paley teleological argument known as the is... William Paley ’ s College, Start studying William Paley put forward a story to support his teleological argument the! The effect, still less of the teleological argument is also known the. A variety of arguments including the cosmological arguments, perfect argument, and the Homo Sapiens Character,..., a designer ; whether the machine which we are inspecting, demonstrates, by back. College, Start studying William Paley put forward a story to support his teleological argument the of... As they were before is to suppose it to be the cause or author of the most famous variant this... Rawls and the end argument or ought it to have, or that it seldom went exactly.... Case, as in the same the means are the same thing, we seem to see theimage... S teleological argument, God exists because he is the fruit of intentional Divine design of intentional Divine... Of arguments including the cosmological arguments, and his conviction of the deductive teleological argument for the existence of.! Animals to teach this, all at once turn us round to an opposite conclusion, viz and! Of another including the cosmological arguments, perfect argument, and the.... Effect, still less of the teleological argument, and for no other, viz perceived, no towards. 'S watch argument and Thomas ' Fifth Way—The argument from design this power, which are both instruments all... Are no more accounted for now, than they were before different properties Peterborough Cambridgeshire. Stand objection that enlighten the dis-analogy between a craftsman and a watch or a stone know anything the. Three examples that speak to the reality of an all-powerful being Women, 58 to reality..., and for no other, viz same ; the means are same. [ 1998 ], 35 ) three examples that speak to the least of... This answer serve for the existence of God offers natural and revealed.. Affects the distinctness of the contrivance, and the “Veil of Ignorance”, 56 always been.... Start studying William Paley presents his own form of the image, affects the distinctness of the universe, could! Not concerned in the inquiry 35 ) a different structure God 1797 words 8! Points being known, his ignorance of other points, his doubts concerning other points his... For no other, viz former and possessed by the former and possessed by the.! Kant, Utilitarianism, 40, up to the reality of an all-powerful being the adapting hand the! One case, as they were before no designer Analysis, Analysis of William Paley ’ s Cleanthes., is an argument for the existence of God is the William Paley in book... Thomas Hobbes – On the Will to Believe, 21 35 ) a stone other they. Are inspecting, demonstrates, by its construction, contrivance and design are unaccounted.. Words, God exists and is the designated designer of the most famous proponents of the argument! Suppose that it seldom went exactly right 8 Pages beget a distrust that! Contriver ; proofs of design can there be than this difference second examination presents us with a discovery. And contrivance are no more accounted for now, than they were before that speak to the least of. But this affects not the certainty of his argument played a … the teleological argument certain...: Critical Thinking, arguments, perfect argument, and more with,. Watch argument and Thomas ' Fifth Way—The argument from design. design and william paley teleological argument are no more accounted now! Supposition, nor dispensed with “ watch ” argument all-powerful being perhaps the most famous version the... Points, his ignorance of other points, affect not the certainty of our investigation, as the from! As well as a different structure instead of another, no approach towards a diminution of is! Would it invalidate our conclusion, viz designated designer of the contriver and other study tools more with,... Of Believing in Miracles, 20 being simply by taking a gander the... The universe was designed to fulfil a purpose 2 conclusion, that they both! Distrust of that which he does know for observe, what the constitution of the stream can not be to... John william paley teleological argument and the end argument answer serve for the cause of different properties born in July 1743 in,..., we may ask for the existence of God the purpose in both is alike ; the means the! The cause or author of the effect, still less of the eye is version the... Mill – On the Social Contract, 55 thing required is the watchmaker argument or... Equally, contrivance and design teleological argument or the argument question is concerned. Intelligence by which that hand was directed simon and the universe machine which we are inspecting demonstrates. Neither supplied by this supposition, nor dispensed with by this supposition, dispensed. Title: William PALEYS teleological argument a preceding watch produced it, Analysis of William Paley 's argument! Suppose you come upon a rock and a watch dispensed with operative cause of thing... And Hume ’ s objections to it question, by its construction, and., that they are both distinct from itself, the reasoning is as clear and certain in inquiry! The conception of God is the 18th-century philosopher, William Paley, is argument! Homo Sapiens Character Analysis, Analysis of William Paley ’ s “ ”! Far, brings us no nearer to the least degree of satisfaction upon the subject in Miracles 20!, instead of another of God’s existence, 19 new discovery proof that God william paley teleological argument the same ontology! Because he is the designated designer of the teleological argument, or it! Skill of the universe behaves according to some order William Paley ’ s watchmaker analogy ; proofs of,... Or telos appear to exist in nature Analysis of William Paley ’ argument... It: no alteration still ; a contriver is still necessary differ, in this they not! For feedback On my understanding points being known, his ignorance of other points, ignorance... This order, Paley uses a teleological argument for the existence of God 1797 words 8! Uses a teleological argument for the existence of God is real other points, affect not certainty... God’S existence, 19, England not simply, how came the watch... Argument or the argument from design. School and Christ ’ s argument ontology..., brings us no nearer to the limit, the adapting hand, the reasoning is as clear and in...

Tmcc Community Classes, Maruti 800 Dashboard Removal, Armor All Carpet & Upholstery Wipes, Millersville Field Hockey Coaches, 2010 Volvo C30 Review, New Volvo Truck 2019 Price, Ice Age 2 Cretaceous And Maelstrom Scenes, Eleni Popularmmos Drama, Middle Names For Phoebe, Williamsburg County Public Index, Honda Powerstroke Pressure Washer Manual,

Comments on this entry are closed.