The force of the verse lies in the idea of the treachery, which was paralleled with the word “abomination.” This makes it something that God loathes, something that is repugnant to God, and therefore tabu. The answer to the peoples’ question was a stinging answer from the prophet. the rhetorical question should be about if we are born with our identity or not. Marriage is an institution of God. Correct; there needs to be at least one witness. The overall forgiveness process is the same: cleaning, healing, scar removal. Leaving a question lingering in the air will allow the reader to spend further time in contemplation. Based on what I bolded above, would this make my earlier post accurate? 2. “A treachery had been committed”--that would get the attention of the audience. The two sins here are inseparably bound together, but the prophet turns his attention now to the treachery on the personal level. Perhaps with the reference to the “tents” we can get the idea of watchmen at either end of the camp, one calling out and the other answering. Do you think that, if they had little hope of ever being rescued from their predicament, they decided to go ahead and have relations, would they be guilty of fornication? How do same sex marriages prophogate the speciers? The expression “wife of your youth” should be understood as “youthful wife,” the wife the man married when he was young and full of love and devotion and ambition and plans. The scenario offered is that there are no witnesses, hence my opinion that there can be no valid marriage. Similes and metaphors are familiar ways to convey complex ideas through language. So I was wondering about something. This word for violence is a word for social injustice. The wives who had been put away were in great mourning and anguish. In its uses for divine punishment, the verb “cut off” can be used for the death penalty at the hands of the people, for premature death at the hand of God, or excommunication from the religious community. It is a life term commitment before God to stay together. For example, he says, the “mothers instead of being able to work for their honest livelihood, are forced to employ all their time in strolling to beg sustenance for their helpless infants” (Swift, 831). The first verse affirms the principle by rhetorical question that they had one father who created them; and the second half expresses the prophet’s amazement over their violation of the covenant. If we are to look to the institution of marriage for progress in truth, stability, and progress in society, then we will be disappointed. Perhaps rephrase the question. To fulfill the first one must be committed to worshiping and serving God in holiness and righteousness. To agree to live together as man and wife is a covenant, and God is the witness. No marriage is perfect. The prophet closes with the same warning: Take heed. . But more to the point, because loyalty to the covenant was paramount, the Law strictly prohibited intermarriage with the pagans (see Exod. Their tears were what God saw, not the offerings of their husbands. Just as man was not made for the Sabbath, neither was man made for the Sacraments. The final section is clearly set off as a warning for those who are in a marriage. (Irene Koshik, Beyond Rhetorical Questions.John Benjamins, 2005) The highest rates of child marriage are seen in West and Central Africa, where over four in ten girls were married before age 18. Well God not only did not need their gifts--he did not want them. Here were men, calloused and less than loyal to the historic faith, coming to the sanctuary with their impressive gifts of dedication and thanksgiving. This second sin grew out of the first, for in finding and marrying pagan women they put away their primary wives by divorce. The line is powerful: “I hate putting away.” Some of the ancient versions actually misinterpreted the line to say, “if a man hates his wife he should put her away.” But the context is against divorce, and an exception as wide as this would not fit. But a sin, or even an embarrassment? However, the greatest question is why she wanted to have a wife. Add/Delete/Edit your Emergency (caregiver) contact. the rhetorical question should be about if we are born with our identity or not. Now a second thing that they did is mentioned by the prophet. Support for this view comes from the fact that the Lord loves Zion (Ps. RHETORICAL QUESTION AND THEIR ANSWERS IN ROMANS RHETORICAL QUESTION: “What shall we say then? a question that is not asked in order to receive an answer from the audience or reader The last clause explains how they did this: “by marrying the daughter (worshiper) of a foreign god.” This expression, we know from Jeremiah 2:27, refers to a worshiper of a strange or foreign deity. These questions are perfect for a road trip. The objective is to find a person you can grow old with, build a life with. And secondly, because a rhetorical question is also a device used or proffered as proof of the negative. A rhetorical question is a question asked more to create an impact or make a statement rather than getting an answer. But in this modern day and age, no one is pressured into an arranged marriage. Rhetorical questions are also sometimes called erotema. Malachi begins by laying down a principle: although Israel was created by one Father, they were guilty of treachery against the covenant. No one would be exempt. A rhetorical analysis of the essay can provide an effective understanding of Brady’s mind in narration. twinkie =) 1 decade ago. They, of course, might choose to take their chances and rely on God understanding their predicament and intentions, but His work outside of the sacraments is a mystery, while His work within the sacraments is dogma. Therefore Malachi warned them to take heed not to deal treacherously, against the wife and therefore against the covenant plan of God. To do this involves two very important considerations: knowing and agreeing with the plan of the covenant God has made for the people of God, and knowing and agreeing with what God has planned for the marriage. Everything You Should Know About Using Rhetorical Questions in … The objective is to find a person you can grow old with, build a life with. And fourth, intermarriage with pagans profaned the holy seed (Ezra 9:2; Jer. These questions are rarely answered in discussions of “marriage equality.” If revisionists think marriage should be redefined, they must develop an alternative definition for it. Leah: The Woman No Man Loved But Every Woman Envied (Gen. 29:15-35), 1. Answer Save. 7:6) and his sanctuary (Ps. 4:22; Deut. - i swear someone just asked that question on yahoo a … The answers are sure to entertain you! The response of the men was again to challenge the word of the prophet: “Wherein have we dealt treacherously?” There is a cold defiance in the words of the people, a defiance that comes from a rationalized sin. The general statement is given first: “the man who does this.” Then the specifics: “him that wakes and him that answers.” There are many suggested interpretations for this difficult phrase. But God adds something else as the object of his hatred--when people cover their garments with violence. Child marriage is known to take place across a wide range of communities, ethnicities and religions. John W. Lv 6. Unfortunately, after the … The idea would be that some Israelites were bringing pagan idolaters into the Lord’s house and therefore profaning it. Sex without that is sin. Rhetorical questions are a great way to achieve that. And it will take such diligence because the way of the world is so different. 114:2). A rhetorical question is asked merely for effect with no answer expected: "Marriage is a wonderful institution, but who would want to live in an institution?" If they knew of the sacrament of marriage before they were “deserted”, again it is quite an irrational scenario…but I’ll play along and say “no”. The husband must be careful and alert to protect the marriage covenant from any treachery, by himself or from outside. An example is... | Meaning, pronunciation, translations and examples Did they not learn from their history and their exile? Some may find that it is too late, because they have lived through a failed marriage and there is no going back. Perhaps a better view is that the “one” refers to the nation of Israel, the covenant people. So, in effect the men covered the altar with tears and sighing--not their tears, for they were cavalier about it all and thought God was pleased with their gifts, but with their wives’ tears, because by causing the pain the men were actually presenting their wives’ grief to God and not a sacrifice. A rhetorical question about gay marriage maybe, "why do some still oppose gay marriage?" or "what makes you you?" The picture is painted dramatically. No passage in the Bible deals with all the details of marriage and divorce. Of course you wouldn't." It heightened, it perfected, the pure, fresh, and serene joys of that Garden, the scene of every beauty and the temple of God; and so it has been perpetuated to this present hour as asocial blessing to soothe and sustain us amidst the depressing and difficulty circumstances of our fallen condition. What we have in the book is a number of his messages; we have them because they are part of the divine revelation of God and timeless in their relevance. Still, child marriage is much more common in the developing world because one of the main driving factors is poverty. Dr Ross joined the faculty of Beeson Divinity School in 2002 as Beeson Professor of Old Testament and Hebrew. One very possible interpretation would be to say the waker and answerer refer to watchmen in the city. The two would have to be committed to the faith and to the training of children in it. Moving from the general description, the prophet now identified the exact problem. To God, however, divorce is a sin, no matter what the causes or circumstances, or who is the guilty party or who is the innocent party. Thus, it seems to lack prudence to make that presumption. We can see from this that God is emotionally involved in the lives of his people. Alerts caregiver when patient stop using the Fall Alert app. Malachi’s style is first to give the theological principle (against which there was no argument), then the general rebuke (over which people would be concerned), and then the actual sin (which would hit home). For marriage to be “holy” matrimony, it must be pleasing to God; and to develop this there must be a real giving of soul to soul in the Lord, so that the husband and wife truly belong to one another, and truly see their marriage as service to God. Pastoral counseling tries to get the parties of a marriage to go back and recall what they had and what they wanted together. 4 d. NO under no circumstances, what if they didn't like sex? 3 Answers. Formally or informally, marriages were dissolved, because all these sins in one way or another affected the family. And we find no better description of this violation and its pain than in the Bible than in Malachi 2. Six Years of poetry-only publishing, PoetsUnlimited was a diverse, engaging and authentic poetry magazine.
rhetorical question about marriage